The judges who host courtroom actuality TV exhibits have normally been actual judges.
Decide Judy (Judy Sheindlin) was a Manhattan household court docket decide. Decide Joe Brown presided in Shelby County, Tennessee, Felony Court docket. Decide Marilyn Milian (“The Individuals’s Court docket”) was a Florida circuit court docket decide.
The record of people that have presided over TV courts has grown lengthy and features a few former attorneys (like Jerry Springer and Religion Jenkins) who made the swap. And virtually with out exception, they’re individuals with respectable authorized backgrounds.
Final November, nevertheless, ABC stepped sideways when it introduced that its new entry into the courtroom reality-TV discipline could be hosted by a humorous and widespread TV persona, Steve Harvey, who has no authorized expertise in any respect.
The truth is, “Decide Steve Harvey”makes no claims on the contrary. As a substitute, ABC says, “Steve performs by his personal guidelines, basing his courtroom on his personal life experiences and a few good outdated frequent sense.”
‘It is a Completely different Type of Court docket’
Harvey is a proficient performer finest often called a standup comedian and host of “Household Feud”for six years. He mentioned in interviews that he had the concept of internet hosting a court docket present for no less than 10 years and that ABC executives rapidly embraced the concept when he introduced it up throughout a Zoom assembly in 2020.
“It is a completely different type of court docket — a court docket of frequent sense,” Harvey says. “I’ve no legislation diploma. I technically don’t have any enterprise being a decide.”
So, does that imply Harvey and ABC are treading on skinny authorized ice right here?
Most likely not — as a result of TV “actuality courts” will not be actually courts.
Anybody who’s conversant in courtroom actuality TV will acknowledge the fundamental idea behind “Decide Steve Harvey.” The exhibits on this class are referred to as “arbitration-based actuality court docket exhibits,” and do not use actors or scripts or re-create eventualities. For essentially the most half, the authenticity does appear real, and that could be a large cause for the recognition of those exhibits.
However to name them “courts” is a stretch. These are arbitrations of the sort that play out by the 1000’s each day within the U.S. as methods for individuals to settle variations with out going to court docket. And arbitrators do not even should be attorneys.
How TV Court docket Reveals Decide Circumstances
The producers of those exhibits usually scour the dockets of small-claims courts on the lookout for disputes that is perhaps good candidates for TV. (Circumstances involving private relationships, like when an ex-wife is suing an ex-husband, rank excessive.) Others, like “Decide Judy,” invite litigants to use by filling out a type that asks for particulars in regards to the case, together with the court docket docket quantity.
The events usually signal a contract that offers the “decide” — the arbitrator — the ability to award cash. This is similar as when individuals conform to arbitrate any dispute — they might not like the end result, however they log off to simply accept it.
Once they obtain a suggestion to seem on TV, many litigants understandably really feel stage fright and a worry of wanting silly. However the exhibits provide inducements. One is that events usually obtain an look charge of between $100 and $300 and compensation for journey prices. Moreover, exhibits usually have their very own funds to pay awards to the profitable events — which, like small claims courts, are normally capped at $5,000 — making it extra probably that individuals who doubt their probabilities of success will take part.
“Decide Steve Harvey,” nevertheless, seems to be upping the ante. The present’s casting web site states that litigants will probably be paid $1,000 for showing on the present and will obtain awards of as much as $10,000 if Harvey guidelines of their favor.
Are Harvey’s Selections Binding?
The selections of TV judges are legally binding, similar to the selections of arbitrators.
However what about Harvey, the humorous man with no trace of a authorized background? Are his selections binding?
The reply is: most likely. The events do signal a contract saying they may abide by the end result. And so they make a couple of dollars, meet a star, and have a narrative they’ll inform their grandchildren.
Past that, although, ABC will not say conclusively how legally binding Harvey’s selections actually are. Additionally they appear to be cautious about what they’re calling it. It is a “comedy courtroom collection,” not actuality court docket TV. It’s leisure at first, and most reviewers of the just lately concluded first season say that Mr. Harvey delivered. The truth is, ABC just lately introduced that “Decide Steve Harvey”will return for a second season.
Not that Harvey hasn’t confronted criticism for a few of his statements and antics following the collection launch in January. Within the collection’ second episode, Harvey laced right into a defendant who refused to marry his accomplice of 20 years and assist assist their three youngsters, telling the person, “You are the stupidest dude I ever met.” ABC executives apparently weren’t proud of the name-calling and recommended that Harvey tone issues down a bit.
Then once more, it is simply leisure. And moreover, Harvey’s not an actual decide.
Phrase depend: 884
Fb Put up
The judges in courtroom actuality TV exhibits have normally been actual judges. However comic/TV persona Steve Harvey, who’s internet hosting the latest entry within the discipline, has no authorized background in any respect. Is that authorized?
You Don’t Have To Resolve This on Your Personal – Get a Lawyer’s Assist
Assembly with a lawyer might help you perceive your choices and the right way to finest shield your rights. Go to our lawyer listing to discover a lawyer close to you who might help.